UK METAL DETECTING

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Insulating my MD from radio interference - possible?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UK METAL DETECTING Forum Index -> Metal Detectors
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tommygunn



Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 12
Location: Misano Adriatico, Italy

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:31 pm    Post subject: Insulating my MD from radio interference - possible? Reply with quote

Right smack bang on top of a hill which I am very interested in searching there are 4 or 5 radio/phone/TV masts that cause severe interference to my MD and make it sound like I'm listening to an out of tune 56k modem.

Is there any possible and feasible way to shield the MD to prevent this?

Are these 'waves' effecting the electrics or the coil?

Can I wrap it in tin foil and maybe my head to help it?

Cheers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
UK Brian



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 431
Location: Wales

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 10:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think your machine runs at 5.7 kHz as you switch on with the adjustment range being around 5.5 to 6 ?
The adjustment was really to allow interference from other machines at rallies to be eliminated not R.F. from masts.

Unfortunately I think your stuck with the problem as it will be picked up through the coil. With a machine with adjustable Pre-Amp you could drop that to reduce outside interference but you don't have that option so if its a good area you really need to get a machine thats away from these frequencies.

Interesting about the batteries in your other post. I would have thought you would have needed both. Fisher did go in for doubling up on battery power to extend the detecting period. The CZ20 and CZ 5/6/6a used the same circuit and had the same performance even though the 20 had twice the amount of PP3's but as it was a diving version they must have felt that an extended running time was necessary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tommygunn



Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Posts: 12
Location: Misano Adriatico, Italy

PostPosted: Tue May 27, 2008 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for your input Brian.
Concerning the batteries, I have yet to try it over an extended period. I'll give it a field test this weekend when I persist with the same interference ridden area.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    UK METAL DETECTING Forum Index -> Metal Detectors All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


© 2007-2008 Informe.com. Get Free Forum Hosting
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group ::